Protecting the Science: Do Timed Judgments of Associations Count as Implicit Research?
The technique presented images or words one by one on the screen and asked participants to indicate whether the image represented the brand under question. This was repeated for several brands using images and words, and the time it took for respondents to make the judgment (i.e. the “response latency”) was taken as a measure of the strength of the relationship.
Are Timed Judgments Really Implicit?
At face value, this seems like a good measure; and that’s because it is a good measure. It is a good conscious measure of brand attribute associations. Essentially, the researchers have done a good job enhancing a stated attribute association question by adding response times to refine the degree of association. Albeit there is some noise in the response time measure they are using, nonetheless, the response times do give additional information on how “easy” it is for participants to make the judgments. However, this measure does not qualify as an implicit research technique.
Why Response Latency Isn’t an Implicit Research Technique
The method succeeds on being indirect, however, it very clearly does not meet the criteria of being uncontrollable. This second criteria is critical for true implicit measures, because these measures are designed to capture System 1 processing. Processing in System 1 is automatic, associative in nature and occurs without our conscious control.
Making a conscious judgment on whether an attribute is associated with a brand is distinctly System 2 in nature, even if the response time is measured. Participants are asked to access their thoughts and make an explicit judgment on the fit between an attribute and a brand. Therefore, this type of technique cannot get around the ‘can’t say’/’won’t say’ issue, and thus does not qualify as an implicit measure.
If we are serious as an applied science, about protecting the accuracy of our conclusions and recommendations, we need to more clearly identify the constructs that new research methods are truly measuring. Enhanced explicit techniques are very valuable as refinements on other explicit measures of attitudes, but are not at the height of research assessing the automatic nature of implicit attitudes.
Creating a Super Bowl ad is always challenging, but the gamebook for Super Bowl LV ads had many potential fumbles to navigate amid a global pandemic, political unrest, economic peril and the ongoing fight for social justice. The stakes for pulling...
How Emotion Played in the Big Game of Advertising Dr. Aaron Reid Founder & CEO at Sentient talked about why ads scored big with Ad Age President and Publisher Josh Golden. Aaron describes how this first of its kind emotion tech RAPID Subtext is...
WATCH LIVE FEB. 8 AT 2:30 P.M. EST: HOW EMOTION PLAYED IN THE BIG GAME OF ADVERTISING Dr. Aaron Reid joins Ad Age President and Publisher Josh Golden for a closer look at how Sentient's cutting-edge behavioral science technology shows which emotions...